Fly Fishers International works to preserve and protect fishery habitats. Many times that protection comes in the form of biological opinion regarding policies and decisions by public agencies whose responsibility is to oversee the water body and surrounding habitat. Fly Fishers International bases its decision about issues on a review of the existing policies or laws governing the agency's action and sound science-based facts. FFI will post a report on this page giving our members an overview of our recent actions. If you have any questions please contact the Conservation Coordinator at email@example.com .
If you want to submit an issue for consideration by Fly Fishers International, please click here to review our process for doing so.
Bristol Bay- 8/22/19- Sent letter supporting alternative legislation on Bristol Bay to 100 clubs and councils targeted by Scott Hed, coordinator of the Save Bristol Bay coalition.
July 2018 to July 2019
the leaders of countries — located primarily in Asia — that are responsible for much of the sea pollution found around the planet’s oceans.
The FFI Conservation Committee has taken the following Conservation Actions or signed off on letters with collaborating partners on the following issues.
With other conservation groups in the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, FFI signed onto a letter to congressional leaders calling for a bipartisan budget agreement that provides relief from sequestration cuts and allows for strong annual funding of natural resources and conservation.
FFI sent a letter to NOAA and the U.S. Corps of Engineers urging swift action on mitigating the effects of a net pen failure in Skagit County, Washington. This letter further urged the Corps to stop issuing permits for new net pens and to investigate the integrity of existing net pens.
FFI sent a letter to Montana Senator Steve Daines encouraging him to support the Yellowstone Gateway Protection Act that was introduced in the United States Senate. If enacted, the bill will provide permanent protection of the Yellowstone from gold and other mining activities on adjacent public lands.
FFI also sent a letter to Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke thanking him for his support for a ban on mining in the Paradise Valley.
FFI sent a letter providing public comment to the United States Forest Service opposing mining in the areas bordering the Boundary Waters Wilderness Area in Minnesota.
FFI signed onto a letter with other conservation groups included in the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership encouraging Maryland Governor Hagen to enact scientifically sound models for managing forage fish like menhaden.
FFI signed onto a letter with other conservation groups included in the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership making recommendations regarding the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program Priorities in the 2018 Farm Bill.
FFI signed onto a letter with other conservation groups included in the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership making recommendations to President Trump regarding priorities in outdoor infrastructure enhancing access to public land and water recreation opportunities, and support for natural infrastructure solutions.
Senior Conservation Advisor Tom Logan made contributions to a document entitled “Lessons Learned- A Blueprint for Securing Our Energy Future While Safeguarding America’s Sporting Heritage”. The document was published by the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.
FFI joined with a number of other like-minded conservation groups in encouraging members of the U.S. Congress to co-sponsor a bill that would prohibit net pen fish farming in the Great Lakes.
IFFF Conservation Action Report
March 21, 2016
The following conservation actions were taken either in the form of a signed letter over IFFF letterhead or endorsement with signature on collaborative comments provided by organizations with whom we are formal partners. The IFFF can have stronger influence regarding agency management and/or regulatory actions in some cases when issues relate specifically to fishes and/or their habitats. But, in many cases the issues may be broader than fish and wetland and speak more too broadly to land and wildlife management and protection issues in ways that include fish and their habitats. The IFFF often can have much more effective impact in these cases by collaborating through partnerships that have professional staff whose total responsibilities are monitoring and speaking on behalf of natural resources and our partners. All documents are retained on file and available for review.
Re-authorization of the Water Resource Protection Act:
The Water Protection Network made a request of the IFFF to provide signature endorsement with other partners to congress regarding reauthorization of the Water Resource Protection Act with six specific reforms to language in the act as additional guidance to the US Corps of Engineers for how the agency reviews and evaluates projects that may adversely affect waters of the US under provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. We agreed with the submittal, found language and recommendations in the document consistent with previous endorsements and provided signature support and endorsement of the letter.
Crevice Mining Group, LLC Application:
IFFF was made aware of an application to the Montana Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) for permit authorization to mine gold on private property northeast of Gardiner and adjacent to the Yellowstone National Park and Absaroka Beartooth Wilderness. A letter was submitted to the DEQ expressing concern for likelihood of adverse effects of the proposed activity on wildlife and wetlands, with specific bases for concern and requesting that the application and proposed activity be fully evaluated through preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with applicable Montana Law that is administered by the DEQ.
Illegal Fish Introductions in Montana:
The Montana Wildlife Federation contacted the IFFF soliciting partnership support of a petition and plan of action to request the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks take additional regulatory steps to bring about an end to the illegal introduction of fish species that continues in Montana. The plan of action was reviewed and found to be comprehensive and warranted. Signature support was provided with intent to monitor progress and provide additional comment when and if appropriate.
Beaverhead River Hydroelectric Project:
It was brought to IFFF's attention that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) had received an application for permit authorization from the Clark Canyon Hydro, LLC, proposing to modify the existing Clark Canyon Hydroelectric Facility at Clark Canyon Dam and that the FERC proposed to process the application under an expedited review. The IFFF chose, in this case, to support partners by submitting comments on IFFF letterhead. Comments generally pointed out that impacts to downstream water quality, fisheries and recreation had already occurred as result of the existing facility and that the proposed activity would be more appropriately reviewed through preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement that would require best available scientific, social and economic data to evaluate existing impacts, necessary solutions and likely further adverse effects that may result from the new proposed activity.
Smallmouth Bass Study:
The US Geological Survey is partnering with Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks; Montana State University and the Joe Brooks Chapter of Trout Unlimited on a study of smallmouth bass impacts in the Yellowstone River. The IFFF has been asked, at the recommendation of Orvis Company to partner on the project as the lead non-profit organization to both support the project but also to administer a $25K grant from Orvis for the project. Orvis, by policy, does not provide grants to government agencies and if provided to the University, substantial administrative overhead would be subtracted from the grant amount before any dollars went towards the study. Among other project support, IFFF has been asked to receive the grant and administer the grant to the agencies and university to both solve the Orvis policy issue and to maximize use of the grant amount for the study. IFFF may charge a minimal percentage for administration of the grant, but this will be another unique opportunity for IFFF to play a vital role as a conservation partner on behalf of our members.
Prepared by: Tom H. Logan
Senior Conservation Advisor